Best candybar phone 20161/12/2024 ![]() We sleep with them, eat with them and carry them in our pockets. As Lesley Alderman observed: “ have an intimate relationship with our phones. In short, computational epidemiologists presumed universal phone‐self subjectivities that followed North American proclivities. In the cell phone–big data–Ebola conjunction, though, it was assumed that a West African and her or his cell phone would be synonymous, operating as one, with an identity that is singular and stable. Anthropologists have long noted how conceptions of the self vary from place to place (e.g., Hallowell 1955 Piot 2010 Rosaldo 1980 Stathern 1988 Stoller 1999). Relative to their big data–Ebola aspirations, computational epidemiologists misunderstood the self. ![]() Unfortunately, this mistake became fixed in later calculations and conceits, as I will explain. Mistaking the cell phone for a person, and vice versa, was where the public health assemblage first went off‐track. This was the first of several ways that the cell phones’ thing‐self problem entered. Computational epidemiologists faithfully believed that things-cell phones-would work as if they were interchangeable with the people who owned them: Tracking a cell phone would mean following a person. ![]() The power of the particular public health assemblage deployed here, connecting cell phones to big data to Ebola, was based on an assumption that things and people exchange properties (Bennett 2004, 355). Moreover, the thing‐power of cell phones is shaped by its grouping, its assemblage with other things and subjectivities. Cell phones are powerful black boxes that house mechanisms that can appear omniscient but in fact can be broken out and examined. Throughout the world, the centrality of the cell phone in people's lives originate in its “thing‐power,” what Jane Bennett has called the condition of a thing that “commands attention as vital and alive in its own right” (Bennett 2004, 350). To explain the mistakes surrounding Ebola‐containment‐by‐phone ambitions, I take up the cell phone's thing‐ness. Focusing on a particular zone of global public health engagement in Sierra Leone 2 in 2014, I describe here how, in a race against time, big data enthusiasts-who understood neither the social lives of cell phones nor the geographies of Ebola-oversold advantages of big data technologies. These experts did not recognize what might be called the “thing‐self” problem of cell phones. They did not know that cell phones and people's selves are related in ways that are not universally shared across nations, cultures, and peoples. In this article, I show that this proposition was flawed largely because of what Harvard‐based computational epidemiologists 1 did not know. Cell phones would serve, according to this logic, as beacons of contagion, signalling the mobility patterns of people with the disease. They counted on the signals cell phones send and receive from cellular towers to leave a trail and thus create digital data sets for tracking people who might be spreading Ebola. In 2014, global public health epidemiologists theorized that cell phones could provide the data necessary to stop Ebola's spread. Apple has vastly improved the iPhone's user experience by increasing RAM to 2GB and adding its new 3D Touch feature.At the center of big data approaches to Ebola containment in West Africa is a curious, yet oddly essential question: What is it about a cell phone-as thing and social artifact-that has any meaningful correlation to the containment of the often‐fatal hemorrhagic disease? To answer this, we must return to how cell phones became part of the effort to contain the largest known outbreak of Ebola. ![]() Our "long-term evaluation" of the iPhone 6s and 6s Plus is complete, culminating in a new flagship phone recommendation. Our initial impression was positive, and it will help make 2016 an exciting year for mobile SoCs.Īll of this testing and analysis (and CES) has kept us pretty busy lately, but we've been working on product reviews too. We got our first look at the A72 as well as ARM's Mali-T880 GPU in HiSilicon's Kirin 950 SoC that makes its debut in the Huawei Mate 8 smartphone. While an evolution of its previous design, ARM made a number of tweaks to improve performance and, more importantly, reduce power consumption. Next, we plunged into the architecture of ARM's Cortex-A72 CPU, which replaces the Cortex-A57 as its flagship 64-bit processor. The 820's new Adreno 530 GPU is also a beast, setting new records in nearly every graphics test. Our performance tests showed an emphasis on floating-point performance and sequential memory bandwidth. Our preview of Qualcomm's new Snapdragon 820 SoC discussed the company's focus on heterogeneous computing and how this influenced the design of its first custom 64-bit CPU, Kryo. In the time since our last update, we've been busy evaluating new SoCs and CPU architectures.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |